Your climate report is thorough. Your biodiversity disclosure is silent.
We screen your facilities and sourcing regions against authoritative protected-area, species and habitat data — then show you what ESRS E4 and TNFD expect you to be able to say about it. Built for mid-market food, agriculture and soft-commodity companies who don't have a biodiversity specialist on staff.
Most companies your size report carbon well and nature not at all
We read the 2025 sustainability reports of mid-market food and beverage companies. The pattern repeats: detailed Scope 1–3 targets, science-based climate milestones — and biodiversity handled in a paragraph, or resting on a claim nobody has checked against a map. That is the gap ESRS E4 and TNFD ask you to close.
One document in. One disclosure-ready screen out.
We read your existing sustainability or annual report, extract your facility and sourcing locations, and screen every one against the biodiversity datasets that TNFD and ESRS E4 point to.
-
01
You send your report
Your existing annual or sustainability report — the one you already publish.
-
02
We extract locations
Facility sites and sourcing regions, including the ones only mentioned in passing.
-
03
We screen each site
Protected-area proximity, threatened species recorded within a set radius, and Key Biodiversity Area overlap — from Protected Planet, GBIF, the IUCN Red List and BirdLife's KBA data.
-
04
You get the gap analysis
A reproducible risk tier per site, the evidence behind it, and TNFD- and ESRS E4-mapped disclosure language you can adapt.
Built to survive contact with your auditor
Screened against Protected Planet (WDPA), GBIF occurrence records, the IUCN Red List and Key Biodiversity Areas — the public, citable datasets that TNFD and ESRS E4 guidance point to. Every finding names its source and its licence.
Every risk tier follows a documented, reproducible rule — not a model's best guess. Two analysts running the same site get the same answer, and the rule that fired is printed next to the tier.
A species record from decades ago is labelled as such — historical or stale — and carries a caveat, rather than being presented with the same confidence as a current sighting. Your auditor will check for exactly this.
See what the actual report looks like
A full sample screening for an agave sourcing region in Jalisco, Mexico — the site in the record above. Findings, risk rationale, recency caveats and draft disclosure language, laid out the way a client report is.
A fraction of a consultancy engagement
- Built for large enterprise clients
- Long onboarding, long timeline
- Rarely priced for mid-market budgets
- Built specifically for mid-market teams
- Monitoring subscriptions from €800/month
- Free pilot screen on one site before you commit
Get a free screen on one of your sites
Tell us your company and one facility or sourcing region. We'll run a real screen and send you what we find — no commitment, no cost.