Turn biodiversity data into auditable evidence for CSRD and TNFD.
Your climate report is thorough; your biodiversity disclosure is silent. We screen every facility and sourcing region against cited public datasets and hand you evidence an auditor can re-open — the source, the query date and the rule behind each finding — then the disclosure language and the next steps that follow from it. Built for mid-market food, agriculture and soft-commodity companies without a biodiversity specialist on staff.
Two dated regulatory triggers
- 30 Dec 2026 EU Deforestation Regulation applies to large and medium operators — due diligence on cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy and wood placed on the EU market. Micro and small enterprises follow on 30 June 2027.
- Oct 2026 ISSB nature-related Exposure Draft targeted for CBD COP17, building directly on TNFD's recommendations and LEAP approach. Proposed as guidance, not yet a mandatory standard.
Dates as published at 15 September 2026. Both have moved before; we update this line when they do.
Seven links, and the evidence travels through all of them
A biodiversity disclosure is only as strong as the chain behind it. Most tools stop at a risk score. A TraqBio screen carries each finding from the map to the sentence in your report to the task on someone's desk — and shows its source at every step.
-
Locate
Every facility and sourcing region from your own report, with the coordinate precision stated — a county centroid is never passed off as a site.
-
Evidence
Protected areas, threatened species records and Key Biodiversity Areas within a fixed radius, each with its dataset, licence and query timestamp. Client runs carry a citable data snapshot.
-
Risk
A tier per site from a documented rule, with the rule that fired printed beside it. Old records change the caveat, never the tier.
-
Materiality
A screening-level indication against the two ESRS dimensions, resting only on findings queried on that run — never on illustrative data — while the determination itself stays yours.
-
Disclosure
Draft ESRS E4 and TNFD language filled from the findings, each code explained, and a quote-with-page from your own report where a financial channel could run.
-
Action
Next steps with an owner and a timeframe, ordered weakest evidence first — pin the location, verify in the field, engage the supplier — not a list of things to consider.
-
Monitor
Same radius, same rules, re-run on a schedule. Because the inputs are fixed, next year's screen is a trend line, not a fresh narrative.
Every link is produced by the screening engine from the same run record, and the report says which sources were queried on that run and which were not.
Most companies your size report carbon well and nature not at all
We read the 2025 sustainability reports of mid-market food and beverage companies. The pattern repeats: detailed Scope 1–3 targets, science-based climate milestones — and biodiversity handled in a paragraph, or resting on a claim nobody has checked against a map. That is the gap ESRS E4 and TNFD ask you to close.
One document in. One disclosure-ready screen out.
We read your existing sustainability or annual report, extract your facility and sourcing locations, and screen every one against the biodiversity datasets that TNFD and ESRS E4 point to.
-
01
You send your report
Your existing annual or sustainability report — the one you already publish.
-
02
We extract locations
Facility sites and sourcing regions, including the ones only mentioned in passing.
-
03
We screen each site — and keep the receipts
Protected-area proximity, threatened species recorded within a set radius, and Key Biodiversity Area overlap — from Protected Planet, GBIF, the IUCN Red List and the World Database of KBAs. Every finding carries its source, licence and query timestamp.
-
04
You get the report — and the to-do list
A reproducible risk tier per site, the evidence behind it, TNFD- and ESRS E4-mapped disclosure language you can adapt, and next steps with an owner and a timeframe. As a web page and as a PDF, generated from the same run.
Built to survive contact with your auditor
Screened against Protected Planet (WDPA), GBIF occurrence records, the IUCN Red List and Key Biodiversity Areas — the public, citable datasets that TNFD and ESRS E4 guidance point to. Every finding names its source and its licence.
Every risk tier follows a documented, reproducible rule — not a model's best guess. Two analysts running the same site get the same answer, and the rule that fired is printed next to the tier.
Each report opens with a status table saying which sources were queried on that run and which were not, and closes with the run record: engine version, query timestamp, licence mix, and the dataset snapshot reference on client runs. Nothing in the report is written by hand.
A species record from decades ago is labelled as such — historical or stale — and carries a caveat, rather than being presented with the same confidence as a current sighting. Your auditor will check for exactly this.
See what the actual report looks like
A full sample screening for an agave sourcing region in Jalisco, Mexico — the site in the record above. Findings, risk rationale, recency caveats and draft disclosure language, laid out the way a client report is.
A fraction of a consultancy engagement
- Built for large enterprise clients
- Long onboarding, long timeline
- Rarely priced for mid-market budgets
- Built specifically for mid-market teams
- Monitoring subscriptions from €800/month
- Free pilot screen on one site before you commit
Get a free screen on one of your sites
Tell us your company and one facility or sourcing region. We'll run a real screen and send you what we find — no commitment, no cost.